The Non-Performing Performer's List


Dr Barry McClelland tells of his frustrations with getting on the GP Performer's List - now handled by outsourcing company, Capita

Newly qualified GPs leave the security of a VTS training scheme and are suddenly thrust into the world as independent practitioners. There are lots of things to consider: sorting out your CV, applying for jobs, indemnity etc.

And then of course there is the performer’s list.

I was advised, like many other trainees to update my status on the list from registrar to GP. How hard could that be?

Send off a few documents, fill out a form and surely that would be that? This could not be further from the truth!

I found the entire process surrounding the performer’s list an absolute shambles and wonder if any of my colleagues have experienced the same?

I first completed the required forms for change of status at the end of July on direction from our GP training scheme tutors. I emailed the forms as suggested and heard nothing back. Approaching the time of starting work I was conscious that my status needed to be updated before I could work.

After several unsuccessful phone calls to NHS England I obtained an email giving me one month grace period to allow change over. Great I thought, that’ll be plenty of time for my change of status to come through.

I got on with settling into my new salaried post and did not think too much more about it.  Until I wanted to do some locum and out of hours work. Most locum agencies and out of hours providers need a letter of confirmation that you are on the list.

Several more phone calls and non-responded emails later, in October my status was changed finally but no letter arrived.

I had to turn down locum work and out of hours work purely because I had no letter of confirmation.

I made weekly phone calls to the performer’s list and sent multiple emails without action. Finally in December (5 months after my initial application) I received an emailed letter of confirmation that I was on the list and my status as a GP confirmed. Hurrah! This was only successful because I refused to hang up the phone until I had the situation resolved.

The whole process was a nightmare.  It should not be anywhere near this troublesome or difficult. The level of bureaucracy and inefficiency was extremely frustrating.

Surely we already have enough scrutiny without this list anyway?

I would be interested to know if anyone else has had a similar experience with the “Non-performing” Performer’s List.






Subscribe to the newsletter

Subscribe to the newsletter

About Lantum

Lantum is a workforce platform that uses technology to simplify all aspects of healthcare staffing.

Our easy-to-use tools empower healthcare organisations to fill their shifts and professionals to fill their diaries, without the need for agencies. And they dramatically reduce time spent on rostering admin, compliance, and invoice chasing.


see all

Lantum on Twitter